<?xml version="1.0"?>		<rss version="2.0">
			<channel>
				<title>Top Five SEO Myths</title>
								<link>http://www.webmasterbrain.com/seo-articles/seo-general/top-five-seo-myths/</link>
				<description>A collection of five very common SEO myths, some propagated even among so-called SEO experts. A belief in anyone of these myths could seriously be holding back your potential.</description>
				<language>en</language>
				<copyright>Copyright 2005 WebmasterBrain.com</copyright>
				<webMaster>webmaster@webmasterbrain.com</webMaster>
				<pubDate>Wed, 18 Oct 2006 12:36:00 GMT</pubDate>
				<lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Oct 2006 12:36:00 GMT</lastBuildDate>	
				
				
									<item>
						<title>what makes a good designer?</title>
						<link>http://www.webmasterbrain.com/seo-articles/seo-general/top-five-seo-myths/what-makes-a-good-designer/</link>
						<description>&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;Great article once again.&amp;lt;/p&amp;gt;&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;what makes it more interesting is that the myths and facts are always overlayed and thus by breaking them dowbn like this it makes for a clearer understand of the issues at hand.&amp;lt;/p&amp;gt;&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;what would be good is if we were able to say that keywords on links are worth x value, H1 tags r worth x value, keywords on URL are worth x points and so on. Then one could devise an algorithm to work out what would be best practise for SEO... &amp;lt;/p&amp;gt;&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;any idea on this??&amp;lt;/p&amp;gt;</description>
						<comments>http://www.webmasterbrain.com/seo-articles/seo-general/top-five-seo-myths/what-makes-a-good-designer/#comments</comments>
						<pubDate>Thu, 24 Aug 2006 10:54:12 GMT</pubDate>
						<category>Top Five SEO Myths</category>
					</item>
										<item>
						<title>what makes a good designer?</title>
						<link>http://www.webmasterbrain.com/seo-articles/seo-general/top-five-seo-myths/what-makes-a-good-designer/</link>
						<description>&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;Great article once again.&amp;lt;/p&amp;gt;&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;what makes it more interesting is that the myths and facts are always overlayed and thus by breaking them dowbn like this it makes for a clearer understand of the issues at hand.&amp;lt;/p&amp;gt;&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;what would be good is if we were able to say that keywords on links are worth x value, H1 tags r worth x value, keywords on URL are worth x points and so on. Then one could devise an algorithm to work out what would be best practise for SEO... &amp;lt;/p&amp;gt;&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;any idea on this??&amp;lt;/p&amp;gt;</description>
						<comments>http://www.webmasterbrain.com/seo-articles/seo-general/top-five-seo-myths/what-makes-a-good-designer/#comments</comments>
						<pubDate>Thu, 24 Aug 2006 11:21:06 GMT</pubDate>
						<category>Top Five SEO Myths</category>
					</item>
								</channel>
		</rss>		
		